CFC rules, the guide

Controlled Foreign Company (CFC) rules are a useful tool that many countries use as part of their fight against tax base erosion. They are useful because they allow specific types of income to be targeted, in specific countries and circumstances. In this guide, I explain how they work and which countries use them.

 

CFC rules explained

To understand how CFC rules work, it is important to first understand what a CFC is.

As the name implies, a CFC is a company that you own, co-own or somehow control but that is not registered in your country of residence. It must also be non-resident for tax purposes in your country of residence. This point is where most people get confused. Basically, if your company is foreign-registered but resident for tax purposes in the country where you reside (via a place of management, permanent establishment or tax treaty), it is NOT a CFC.

Even when the two criteria above have been satisfied, your company may not necessarily qualify as a CFC. Most countries have specific requirements related to the type of income generated, the company’s tax situation and the amount of control each owner has.

With that clarified, let us move back to our main topic.

Explaining how CFC rules work can be tricky due to the per-country differences in implementation but in short, they aim to remove any tax advantage potentially gained by shifting profits to a CFC.

They accomplish this by forcing the attribution of CFC profits to the owners, proportionally to their controlling interest, and by having those attributed profits taxed in the parent jurisdiction.

To be clear, the CFC itself is never affected by the rules or subject to any additional taxes. Only the owners are.

To better illustrate how this works in practice, I have prepared two case scenarios.

 

Case one

Dim Sum LTD is a holding company registered in Hong Kong. 45% of it is owned by John McMillan, a citizen and tax resident of New Zealand. Dim Sum LTD was registered for the sole purpose of holding the shares of a number of companies in which John McMillan and his business partner Eric Ng have invested in. Dim Sum LTD qualifies as a CFC under New Zealand’s CFC rules because over 40% of it is owned by a New Zealand tax resident and more than 10% of its income is derived from passive sources. As such, for New Zealand tax purposes, 45% of its income is attributed to John McMillan and liable for taxation.

 

Case two

HIJ LTD is a company registered in Labuan, Malaysia. It is owned by Kaito Shimizu, a citizen and tax resident of Japan. HIJ LTD was registered to act as the second partner in a UK LLP that Kaito also owns. The reasoning behind the Labuan company was that Kaito could attribute it part of the LLP profits and thus shelter them from Japanese taxation. HIJ LTD qualifies as a CFC under Japan’s CFC rules, however, because over 50% of it is owned by a Japanese tax resident and because its effective tax rate is under 20%. As such, for Japanese tax purposes, its entire income is attributed to Kaito and liable for taxation. In this case, the CFC rules not only remove any of the benefits that such a structure would normal offer but also adds unwanted complexity and costs.

 

The countries

Full CFC regimes

Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, Chile, China, European Union, Egypt, Iceland, Indonesia, Israel, Japan, Korea, Mexico, New Zealand, Norway, Peru, South Africa, Turkey, United Kingdom, United States, Uruguay, Venezuela.

 

CFC rules in the European Union

With the implementation of the Anti Tax Avoidance Directive, all EU countries now have broad CFC rules. For more details about the directive, I recommend reading this guide.